Part of The Petherbridge Bassra Group

opuslaw_inline_500px.jpg
PB_2018_centre_wo.png
B&D_Short_WO.png
Brimble&Co_wo.png
UK_leading_firm_2016.jpg
UK_leading_firm_2017.jpg
UK_leading_firm_2018.jpg
UK_leading_firm_2019.jpg
uk_recommended_lawyer_2020.jpg

Awarded to Sarah Batty

and Ben Jones.

uk_leading_firm_2020.jpg
Lexcel-Accredited-colour-wo.png
follow-twitter-wo.png

Petherbridge Bassra Solicitors Limited is a Company registered in England and Wales under Company Number 9049249. The registered office is Vintry House, 18-24 Piccadilly, Bradford BD1 3LS. A list of Directors is open to inspection at the registered office. The Company is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) as a licensed body law practice under number 613817. ‘Petherbridge Bassra’, ‘Opus Law’, ‘Brimble & Co’, ‘Bird & Daniels’ and ‘SH Dad & Co’ are trading names of Petherbridge Bassra Solicitors Limited.

© 2018 | Opus Law Limited. Created by asksmf.com 

UK_leading_firm_2017.jpg
Lexcel-Accredited-colour.png
NOT GUILTY. D Found Not Guilty Of Money Laundering

Ben Jones acted for D who appeared at the Crown Court charged with money laundering.

 

D was stopped by the police driving a vehicle. The vehicle passenger footwell contained a black bin liner. The contents of which revealed two plastic boxes containing £133,000. The prosecution case was that this sum was criminal property, namely the concealment (the evidence showing it had previously been buried), and thereafter possession when it was moved in the vehicle.They therefore charged the defendant with money laundering. Not guilty pleas were entered and the matter proceeded to trial.

 

A successful application of no case to answer was made at the conclusion of the prosecution case. Not guilty verdicts were therefore recorded.  The judge did not accept that the circumstances in which the property was handled give rise to the irresistible inference that the money can only be derived from crime.

 

Following persuasive submissions the Judge agreed that there was nothing suspicious in the way the cash was being transported. The prosecution submission that the sheer quantity of cash led to an inference of guilt was described by the Judge as “a fallacious submission”.

 

Sarah Barlow of Exchange Chambers was instructed as counsel for D.

 

 

Case represented by Ben Jones, Opus Law.