Part of The Petherbridge Bassra Group

opuslaw_inline_500px.jpg
PB_2018_centre_wo.png
B&D_Short_WO.png
Brimble&Co_wo.png
UK_leading_firm_2016.jpg
UK_leading_firm_2017.jpg
UK_leading_firm_2018.jpg
UK_leading_firm_2019.jpg
uk_recommended_lawyer_2020.jpg

Awarded to Sarah Batty

and Ben Jones.

uk_leading_firm_2020.jpg
Lexcel-Accredited-colour-wo.png
follow-twitter-wo.png

Petherbridge Bassra Solicitors Limited is a Company registered in England and Wales under Company Number 9049249. The registered office is Vintry House, 18-24 Piccadilly, Bradford BD1 3LS. A list of Directors is open to inspection at the registered office. The Company is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) as a licensed body law practice under number 613817. ‘Petherbridge Bassra’, ‘Opus Law’, ‘Brimble & Co’, ‘Bird & Daniels’ and ‘SH Dad & Co’ are trading names of Petherbridge Bassra Solicitors Limited.

© 2018 | Opus Law Limited. Created by asksmf.com 

UK_leading_firm_2017.jpg
Lexcel-Accredited-colour.png
NOT GUILTY in Liverpool Duty Evasion Trial

S was charged with Conspiracy to evade excise duty between October 2013 and December 2014 . The case involved the sale of laundered red diesel to the public from 3 service stations in the Midlands and North West to an overall value of nearly £500,000.

During the course of the trial it became apparent that the Officer in the case had a large amount of material contained on a laptop that had never appeared on a unused material schedule.

The Judge, HHJ Trevor–Jones, conducted a Voire Dire in which it became apparent there had been an extended failure to observe and act upon the continuing disclosure obligations from the beginning of the investigation in 2013 up to and during the trial a period of some 4 years .The material was located on the officers laptop and had never been moved across to the designated disclosure officers.

The judge described it as “ negligence to a lamentable degree”  and went on further, stating in relation to the officer “ he appears to have been recklessly unaware of his obligations both as a member of the investigative team but also his role of Officer in the case".

Each of the defendants had Not Gulity verdicts entered and on behalf of our client a defendant’s cost order was awarded.

 

The case  attracted much media attention:

http://www.2harecourt.com/2018/05/03/disclosure-failings-result-collapse-multi-million-pound-evasion-excise-duty/

 

Unfortunately one defendant pleaded Guilty at an early stage in the proceedings and is currently submitting applications to withdraw his Guilty Plea.

 

 

Case represented by Phillip Priestley, Opus Law.