Part of The Petherbridge Bassra Group

opuslaw_inline_500px.jpg
PB_2018_centre_wo.png
B&D_Short_WO.png
Brimble&Co_wo.png
UK_leading_firm_2016.jpg
UK_leading_firm_2017.jpg
UK_leading_firm_2018.jpg
UK_leading_firm_2019.jpg
uk_recommended_lawyer_2020.jpg

Awarded to Sarah Batty

and Ben Jones.

uk_leading_firm_2020.jpg
Lexcel-Accredited-colour-wo.png
follow-twitter-wo.png

Petherbridge Bassra Solicitors Limited is a Company registered in England and Wales under Company Number 9049249. The registered office is Vintry House, 18-24 Piccadilly, Bradford BD1 3LS. A list of Directors is open to inspection at the registered office. The Company is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) as a licensed body law practice under number 613817. ‘Petherbridge Bassra’, ‘Opus Law’, ‘Brimble & Co’, ‘Bird & Daniels’ and ‘SH Dad & Co’ are trading names of Petherbridge Bassra Solicitors Limited.

© 2018 | Opus Law Limited. Created by asksmf.com 

UK_leading_firm_2017.jpg
Lexcel-Accredited-colour.png
The Prosecution Fail in Procceds of Crime Application

The Proceeds of Crime Act leaves debts that do not go away. The prosecuting authority are entitled to bring further proceedings if a Defendant is found to have further assets later down the line, until the benefit figure is met.

 

The Prosecution in this case became aware that D had assets that they were previously unaware of and now wanted, a BMW motor vehicle and cash in his savings account. The defendant had,  since his release from his prison sentence,  worked hard and legitimately, paying his  taxes and saving his money for a number of years. The prosecution, in law, were entitled to it.

 

Represented by Phil Priestley of Opus Law, it was advanced that the car was a necessity for day to day life- driving to work and to see his children who lived some 40 miles away. The money in his account was savings for a deposit to buy a home.

 

The Judge hearing the application was not impressed by the prosecutions application. Having turned his life around the Judge was loathed  to take these assets away, in a move that would have left the defendant somewhat disgruntled. It could also have led the Defendant to seek to hide assets in the future or even turn back to a life of crime.

 

The judge sensibly rejected the application made and our client kept his car and his cash.

 

 

Case represented by Phillip Priestley, Opus Law.